Tag Archives: Growth

One Trade Does Not Provide Enough Data


I think it's time we revisited a topic we discussed a few years back. The fact that an individual trade does not provide sufficient data to allow you to make informed changes to your plan.

Changes MUST consider the impact across a series of trades.

I see this problem repeatedly in email conversation with new traders, who have not yet understood the nature of edge.

Their questions come in various forms but this latest one is typical of the general nature of all of these questions:

  • "I took profits on this trade at the target area, only to see it then continue on without me. I could have got twice the profit if I held. Do you think I should use a trailing stop rather than targets?"


The trade involved a 2R profit at the target, which could have been 4R if he held for a trail exit. An addition of 2R to the account balance.

And so the trader was disappointed. And frustrated. Because when viewed after the fact, it was just SO OBVIOUS!

But here's the problem:

<image: One trade does not provide enough data>

<image: One trade does not provide enough data>

<image: One trade does not provide enough data>

<image: One trade does not provide enough data>

<image: One trade does not provide enough data>

<image: One trade does not provide enough data>

This is the whole point of a post that I shared about a fortnight ago.

<image: Fight to get to the next level>

Progress comes from analysis and review of your performance over a series of trades. Not individual trades.

Changes to your plan must come from analysis of results over a series of trades, whether you prefer to use samples of fixed number (20, 50, whatever) or a fixed time period (weekly, monthly).

You ask, "I took profits on this trade at the target area, only to see it then continue on without me. I could have got twice the profit if I held. Do you think I should use a trailing stop rather than targets?"

Or even a more generic, "Do you think I should make "xyz" change to my plan?"

Here's my response:

  • Only if you're seeking an answer in response to a recognised problem or underperformance across a series of trades, and not one individual trade.
  • And only if your subsequent investigation of that problem or underperformance shows clearly that this change would have improved your edge over that series of trades.
  • If yes to both, then implement the change and see what it does to the next group of trades.


You have access to this information. Do the work.

Assess the outcome over a larger sample.

And determine the appropriate plan of attack for your next series of trades.

You might argue, "But Lance, we don't know how the change will impact the next series?"

True. No-one knows.

That is why you continue to assess. Make the changes and then reassess. Did they help? Or is further work required?

Continue to track performance. And continue to learn, grow and develop in pursuit of never-ending improvement in both profits and consistency.

But never due to an emotional reaction to one single trade. This is a game of profiting over a SERIES of trades.

Happy trading,

Lance Beggs


Related Articles:



Trader Motivation


For the first time in maybe a decade I'm not writing a post this week. Not because I lack motivation. But rather, because I've come across an exceptional resource (from Alex Vermeer) that I want to share with you.

The journey to becoming a trader is a long and frustrating one. So the more you can provide yourself with knowledge and skill in maintaining motivation, and in overcoming lapses of motivation, the faster and more effectively you will progress.

If this is an area you feel you can improve, please review and make use of the following information.

Step 1: Read the following two preliminary articles… and implement the advice they offer.

(a) Part one – Things we can do IN GENERAL to reduce procrastination

(b) Part two – Things we can do RIGHT NOW to reduce procrastination

Step 2: Go to the following webpage to download a copy of the summary "How to Get Motivated" poster. Save it and make use of it to trigger changes in behaviour, whenever you need a motivational boost.

Link: https://alexvermeer.com/getmotivated/

Scroll just over half way down the page to find the posters in various sizes.

<image: Trader Motivation>

(Source: https://alexvermeer.com/getmotivated/)

I hope this helps provide you with some clear and actionable plans for beating procrastination and doing the work necessary to make this year the best yet.

Happy trading,

Lance Beggs

PS. I discovered this great resource through the weekly newsletter provided by Recomendo – https://www.getrevue.co/profile/Recomendo



5 Steps for Daily Improvement


The following screen capture was sent out via social media a fortnight ago.

I think it's so important that I want this to go out to everyone on the newsletter list as well. Plus an entry into the blog for future readers.

It's a quick response to an exceptional question – what are five things I do every day which have got me to where I am.

Thanks Alessandro. Great question!


<image: 5 Steps for Daily Improvement>

Add these steps into your process, if they're not already there.

And repeat.

Every day.

This is the path to trading success – incremental improvements in skill driven by a quality review process.

Happy trading,

Lance Beggs



Bridging the Gap between Sim and E-minis


I make it a practice to never recommend any particular market as being suitable for your trading. It's none of my business what you choose to trade. I don't offer financial advise and to do so would be completely irresponsible as I have no insight into your individual needs or circumstances. (For more, see here for my Disclaimer and Terms & Conditions.)

However, I do care that you survive the learning curve.

So if you've made an independent decision to trade a market, and there is a lower risk option available, then please start there.

Prove success at the smaller level first. And build up to full size contracts and larger position sizes.

E-mini traders – don't trade the E-mini's until you've confirmed you can trade the Micro E-mini's. Forex traders – don't trade full size lots until you've confirmed you can trade the mini or micro lots.

If you do have edge, you'll transition quickly to larger size.

But until that is proven, please:



The gap between sim and full-size contracts is quite large (in terms of risk). Make use of these "smaller" markets to bridge the gap and make the transition to live trading just a little smoother.

I was contacted by a trader who has recently gone live but then preceded to bleed his account into a 30% drawdown.

He's not trading the YTC strategy. I was pleased to hear that!

And I was most pleased to hear that he was smart enough to stop trading at 30% loss.

But here's what really annoyed me.

Although his 5-figure account size is sufficient for trading E-minis with 3 contracts, as a new trader he has no right to be starting there when other options are available.

New traders – PLEASE – always start live with the smallest position sizes available. And build from there, slowly and incrementally, as success and consistency are proven at each level.

Since May, the CME has offered Micro E-mini contracts.

MES – Micro E-Mini S&P 500 – the micro equivalent of the ES

MYM – Micro E-Mini Dow – the micro equivalent of the YM

MNQ – Micro E-Mini NASDAQ – the micro equivalent of the NQ

M2K – Micro E-Mini Russell – the micro equivalent of the RTY

All micro contracts being 10 times smaller in size than the equivalent E-mini.

See here for contract specifications – MES, MYM, MNQ, M2K.

Yes… the same markets… almost exactly the same charts… but 10 times smaller.

The number one rule for trading is to survive to trade another day (IIRC this was a lesson I got from Larry Williams). I highly recommend you adopt this rule in your own trading. But as a new trader who has yet to establish a proven track record, it's even more important.

Start small. And build from there slowly and incrementally.

I've finally managed to play with the MNQ in recent weeks.

The following was the 14th October, the Columbus Day holiday. Holidays are typically a "stand aside" day for me due to the potential for low volume, narrow range and largely unfavourable conditions.

So I just "played" with MNQ while doing other work.

<image: Micro E-Mini Futures>

<image: Micro E-Mini Futures>

<image: Micro E-Mini Futures>

<image: Micro E-Mini Futures>

<image: Micro E-Mini Futures>

<image: Micro E-Mini Futures>

<image: Micro E-Mini Futures>

<image: Micro E-Mini Futures>


I'm going to use MNQ for testing, alongside NQ. New trade ideas. And different trade management plans.

I've never been good at trading multiple markets at once, on these low timeframes. But with this idea the analysis for both is essentially the same, so I'm aiming to trade NQ and "test and develop" MNQ at the same time.

I'm also going to include more MNQ trades in the newsletter and blog, to hopefully show you that it's not only ok to trade, but a damn good market for bridging the gap from sim to E-minis.

Back to our trader with the drawdown.

He's taking a break to:

  • Clear his mind
  • Replenish his funds
  • Review the cause of his failure
  • Define solutions
  • Restart on sim
  • And transition to micro contracts, building slowly from there, increasing size incrementally as success and consistency is proven at each level.


A smarter plan.

A more survivable plan.

If you're just starting out, or approaching the stage where you transition from sim to live markets, consider adopting a similar slow and steady progression plan.

Lower risk. And increase your odds of surviving the learning curve.

Happy trading,

Lance Beggs



What if you Narrowed Your Focus – 2


I want to expand upon an important idea which we covered a bit over a year ago (and which I shared on social media again recently).

That is the idea that while learning and developing as a trader, you may find greater value in narrowing your focus and specialising in just one small segment of the daily trading session.

The prior article was here – https://yourtradingcoach.com/trading-process-and-strategy/what-if-you-narrowed-your-focus/

And the suggestion was that rather than fight through 6.5 hours of a full trading session, leaving little time to focus on replay and review, why not try to specialise in just the opening hour.

One hour of trading… during the time when the market most often (but not always) provides the best hourly range.

And then review!

Find the lessons… replay the sequence… and LEARN.

Get profitable on this short sequence of price action. Ignore the rest. You can always add it back later, if you wish.

Now let's expand upon this idea just slightly!

The opening hour is not the only option.

And the fact is that this type of sequence will not suit all traders.

<image: What if you narrowed your focus?>

<image: What if you narrowed your focus?>

If you like fast pace momentum drives and are comfortable with a little more "uncertainty", then perhaps you will love the open like I do. And enjoy the game of getting into sync with this new and evolving daily structure.

But again, this is not the only option.

If you don't find a liking to the pace and uncertainty of the open, then why not just let the opening structure play out. And then trade off that structure.

The opening hour is often referred to as the Initial Balance (IB) area.

Let the IB form. Let the market give you clues as to what type of day we might be in store for. Is it trending? Is it ranging? Is it volatile? Or is it dull and lifeless? Let the market set up some significant levels for you (IB high and low and any in-between).

And then trade off that already-formed structure.

You don't need to specialise in the opening hour. If you find you're not suited to that type of action, maybe you could specialise in trading from 10:30 through till midday?

<image: What if you narrowed your focus?>

<image: What if you narrowed your focus?>

There is no right or wrong.

The opening hour will sometimes offer incredible opportunity. At other times it will provide a real challenge.

The same applies for those trading after the opening hour. At times the structure and opportunity will be clear. Other times it will make for a very hard day at the office.

The point is that they offer different options for the trader who is struggling to gain some consistency. For someone who might benefit from narrowing their focus. And from specialising in a shorter sequence of price action and allowing greater time for replay, review and learning.

Play with both options and see what best fits your needs and your personality.

I like the opening sequences. They're faster. They offer incredible range at times.

But it's not the only option.

However you choose to do this, it's a simple concept.

Narrow your focus. Build expertise in one smaller sequence. And FIGHT to get off that cycle of continual failure.

Go for it! You can do this!

Lance Beggs



My Go-To Method for Solving Trading Problems – Part Two


Part One is here if you missed it – https://yourtradingcoach.com/trading-business/my-go-to-method-for-solving-trading-problems/

In that article I presented a three question framework which I use to seek solutions to any of my trading problems.

  1. Can I avoid the problem?
  2. Can I reduce the frequency?
  3. Can I reduce the consequences?


Or in simpler English:

  1. Is there something I can do that will ensure I never even encounter "the problem"?
  2. Is there something I can do that will ensure "the problem" won't happen as often as it has been?
  3. Is there something I can do such that when "the problem" does occur, the negative outcome won't be so


To work through an example, we used a question I received on Twitter a short while ago:

<image: The problem...>

In other words…

  • An inability to trust a rally resulting in continued attempts to fade the rally and grinding your way into a completely avoidable drawdown.


Visualising "the problem", it would be something like this:

<image: The problem...>

I then requested your feedback on how you might solve such a problem through either one or all of the three questions.

Well didn't that create a lot of work for me! Ha ha.

I must say I was blown away by both the number and quality of the responses. I am 99% certain I replied to all of them. If I missed yours, please let me know.

Rather than simply listing all of the responses here (because there will be a lot of repetition), I will instead just summarise the main ideas:


Can I avoid the problem?

Is there something I can do that will ensure I never even encounter "the problem"?

This is my first go-to option. If I can find a solution here that is quick and easy to implement, I'll try this first.

This is recognising that often we don't need to address the problem and its myriad of potential underlying causes, if we can just avoid it.

If you get sick eating seafood… just don't eat seafood.

So looking at the problem of a trader who continually destroys their session through fading a bullish trend, how can they avoid it?

Many of you came up with the same idea that immediately pops into my mind for the "Avoid" category:

Don't trade bullish environments!

You said:

<image: The problem...>

You ask for help changing your mindset. But it's much quicker and easier to:

(a) Accept that this is how you are.

(b) Study your trade history to understand the market structure or environment which leads you to struggle.

(c) And develop clear and unambiguous rules to avoid this structure or environment in future.

In other words, ONLY trade in an environment which is naturally suited to short selling.

And avoid everything in which short selling is a lower probability option.

Maybe something like this:

<image: Avoiding the Problem>

<image: Avoiding the Problem>

Or maybe you will have some better idea. After all, you know your trading.

The point is… you need to dig into your trade history. Find and understand the conditions that lead to you fighting a bullish trend. And then set in place rules to avoid them.

Don't try to solve the problem. Avoid it.

Rather than fighting your bias, accept it and embrace it. And maybe specialise in being a short-seller in bearish market environments.

Note what we've done here. The problem still exists. You still have a strong preference for short entries. And the potential for danger still exists if you acted upon this tendency in a strong and persistent uptrend. But you've avoided the problem by setting clear and unambiguous guidelines which seek to avoid these uptrending environments.

We're not trying to find a way to comfortably trade long in an uptrending environment. We're not trying to find a way to improve our skill in shorting an uptrending market. You can work on these later if you wish. First things first though – let's stop the damage through the quickest means available. Identify an uptrending market and stand aside.

Avoid the problem… it's often the quickest and easiest solution.


Can I reduce the frequency?

Don't like the "Avoid" solution?

Ok. That's fine. You won't always find an answer. And you won't always find an answer you like. Let's move on to the other two questions.

Is there something I can do that will ensure "the problem" won't happen as often as it has been?

So here, we're not trying to avoid bullish environments. We're not limiting ourselves to certain sections of the market structure.

We are allowing ourselves to trade in a bullish environment.

But we need some solutions to ensure that when it is bullish, we can (at least sometimes) find a way to align ourselves in that bullish direction, thereby reducing the number of times we find ourselves fading the trend.

Again the responses from readers were spot on, with the following being the main ideas:

Limit to with-trend trades only.

Very closely related to the above solution. But this time we operate with clear and unambiguous rules that limit our trading to with-trend only.

Limit yourself to short opportunity when the trend structure is bearish. Limit yourself to long opportunity when the trend structure is bullish. And stand aside when the trend structure is neutral, sideways or uncertain.

Naturally this doesn't guarantee trading success. Recognition of the environment will not always be perfect. Quick recognition of change of environment will not always be perfect. Execution will not always be perfect. And compliance with our rules may not always be perfect. That's fine. We will deal with this separately if it becomes a problem.

But what this does achieve is that it ensures you will rarely find yourself repeatedly fighting a bullish market.

Trade with a guard rail.

No-one picked up on this solution. But it's one of my personal favourites so I'm going to include it here. I've recommended this to several people over the years, with great effect.

I like clean charts without indicators. But that does not mean I'm against the use of indicators if they add value to your trading. And one good use for an indicator is to provide confidence through placing a "guard rail" at your back

<image: Reducing the Frequency>

This doesn't seek to avoid bullish environments. And it doesn't prohibit trading short. Instead it acts to increase confidence in holding a long position, thereby reducing the frequency with which you'll find yourself repeatedly fighting the uptrending market.

Multiple Scenario Planning

Always have in mind multiple potential paths for price action. Ideally at least one bullish and one bearish scenario.

You're fighting the uptrend because you believe it should be moving lower. But have you actually viewed the charts too see if there is the possibility of a bullish scenario?

Assuming the market had a chance of going up today, what could it look like?

If you have pre-accepted multiple scenarios for potential price movement, and at least one of them involves price moving higher, you're more likely to recognise and accept the bullish conditions when they occur and more easily able to align yourself in that direction.

Trading level to level

Overlay the higher timeframe market structure with an S/R grid and use that to define the general market bias as price moves from level to level.

Again, this works like the idea of multiple scenario planning, discussed above. It's harder to get stuck in a mindset of "this market should be moving lower" when you've defined clear levels and have accepted that the market is bullish while above certain levels.

Limit counter-trend short entry to key levels only.

Extending the idea above of trading level to level, this now also gives us a solution for how we can still trade short against a rising uptrend.

Limit that sort of trading to ONLY the times when price interacts with one of our higher timeframe levels.

All other action, away from these levels, is limited to with-trend (long) opportunity.

Overwhelm yourself with study after study of bullish market environments.

One response suggested reviewing 100 days of uptrends. Ha ha!

Absolutely yes. This will leave you in no doubt about the fact that markets can and do go up a whole lot more than you expect. It's a beautiful solution.

What is good about the 100 charts solution is that it goes a long way to correcting the faulty underlying beliefs, leading the trader to somewhat accept the idea that markets can safely rally. And while you may at times slip back into old habits of fading the trend, the frequency of occurrence will be reduced due to the many times now when you find the confidence to go long with the trend.

Operate with multiple independent methods of assessing bias.

No-one guessed this solution. It's one of of the ones I came up with, which I think could be effective in limiting how often you get stuck fighting a trend.

I assume that you're operating at the moment with two means of identifying the potential future movement of price – some form of assessment of the trend PLUS gut-feeling. And in your case the gut-feeling is over-riding the trend analysis.

Maybe try increasing the number so that you have three or more independent methods of assessing bias, one of which might still be gut-feeling. Perhaps add some market internals, or VWAP, or a higher-level orderflow tool like cumulative delta. When a majority of methods are suggesting a bullish bias, this may give more confidence in trading in this direction and ignoring the gut feeling of "it should be bearish"

Operate with multiple independent methods of assessing bias AND a measure of confidence.

Taking the above idea one step further, why not add a degree of confidence to your gut-feeling.

We previously discussed this idea as it relates to price targets – https://yourtradingcoach.com/trading-process-and-strategy/applying-a-degree-of-confidence-to-price-targets/

It applies just as well to your bias.

"Ok, I feel like it should be going down… with maybe 60% confidence… but given all the other methods are suggesting bullish then 60% is clearly not enough. I'm trading with-trend."

Turn the chart upside down.

I didn't expect this response but ended up getting it twice.

I actually tried this myself several years ago. Like the reader who posed the question, I also have a preference for short trades. Not to the same extent where it damages my edge. But it's simply a case of short trades feeling comfortable while anything long is really uncomfortable. Even to this day. It just doesn't ever go away.

Back in the days of Ninja Trader 7, I came across an indicator which flipped the chart upside-down.

Perfect. Problem solved. Whenever there was a bullish market, I'd simply shift my focus from my normal chart to the upside down chart, so that it looked bearish.

It works surprisingly well. I could take a long position in that uptrending market, and hold it quite comfortably, simply because it looked like a short position in a down-trending market.

Unfortunately though, I couldn't execute from the chart. So I got rid of it and went back to normal charts.

But if you have a different platform which offers the ability to flip charts, or someone who can code a solution, this might be an option for you.


Can I reduce the consequences?

Is there something I can do such that when "the problem" does occur, the negative outcome won't be so bad?

Again we don't seek to avoid bullish environments. And this time we don't want to limit our ability to short an uptrending market.

But is there some way we can do this more safely, such that the damage incurred will be less in those times we do get it wrong?

Reduced position sizing for counter-trend setups.

Not necessarily a permanent solution. But perhaps one you can use temporarily, until such time that you can improve your skill in timing a counter-trend short entry.

Cut your size to the absolute smallest allowed in your market.

Continue to monitor stats and the impact these setups have on your edge. If you can't develop a positive edge, you will eventually need to abandon them. But until you've accepted that once and for all, cut the size to ensure smaller losses.

You can always increase again if you improve in skill to the point where these trades are providing a positive input to your edge.

Limit counter-trend drawdown to a fixed number of losses.

I've talked about my personal rule before: When two trading ideas fail to work, I consider the need for a break. When three fail to work, I force a break. Either I'm wrong about the market bias, or my execution is poor, so I have no business trading. Take a break. Walk away. Do not come back till your mind is clear and the structure and conditions have shifted to something more tradeable.

If you can do this, the consequences of fighting a market bias will be reduced to (at worst) three losses.

Better counter-trend entries… closer to the stop.

There was only one response which suggested this. I like it.

It attempts to limit the consequences of fading a persistent uptrend through bringing your entry price closer to your stop. Maybe this will be enough to bring these sequences closer to breakeven or small profit.

The suggestion was that, rather than using your entry signal as a trigger to place a MARKET or STOP entry order, you use that signal as a trigger to place a LIMIT order higher. You're fading the trend. There is a good chance of some retrace. So try to take advantage of it and improve your entry price.

As with any of these "reduce consequences" options – they're still allowing you to trade in the environment that was causing problems, in the direction that opposes the market bias. So you need to monitor stats and track the impact this has on your edge. As mentioned above, if you can't get this to provide a positive edge then you seriously need to abandon this idea of trading counter-trend against a bullish market.


Wrapping Up

So there we are. It really is quite simple.

In the majority of cases all we had to do was come up with a set of rules to limit our ability to short an uptrending market. The markets offer incredible freedom to enter and exit at any time of your choosing. Successful traders place limits on this freedom, to ensure trade decisions have the greatest chance of providing a positive edge.

For the trader who sent me the original question: Your path from here is to identify the potential solution (or multiple solutions) which you feel may best suit your needs. And test it. Implement the idea through a trial period, tracking the results to confirm whether or not it was effective.

For everyone else: The point of this was not to provide you with techniques to limit the damage from constantly selling into an uptrending market. Rather the point was to demonstrate the problem solving framework in action.

And given the number and quality of responses I received, it's clear that many of you have seen how easy it is to come up with solutions.

That is where the three questions help. They provide some structure to your decision making, taking you from "stuck" to at least having some idea of where to look.

This works not just with "I keep getting run over by an uptrending market". You'll find it helps with many problems throughout your trading career. So whenever you're stuck, ask:

  1. Can I avoid the problem?

  2. Can I reduce the frequency?

  3. Can I reduce the consequences?


Sometimes, depending upon the type of problem being solved, you'll find some overlap between the "Avoid" and "Reduce" categories. You might have felt that with the solutions presented above. If you feel a solution that you come up with fits best in the "Avoid" category while I put it in one of the "Reduce" categories, that is fine. Either way the three-question framework has led you to a potential solution. That is all that matters.

Happy trading,

Lance Beggs



PS. What are Questions Four and Five?

I was asked by a few people about questions four and five in the original framework. I didn't include these as they're not relevant to most trading problems. But for those interested, here they are:

4. Can I transfer the risk?

This typically means to shift the risk to another agency which is better able to manage or accept that risk. For problems outside of the trading world, insurance is the perfect example of this solution. Faced with the risk of loss of property, we can transfer this risk to another party through purchasing insurance cover.

In trading, an example of risk transfer might include building up a track record via sim and then seeking employment with a Prop firm, or perhaps seeking funding through one of the online sites which provide such a service. Not a viable solution for problems of continually fading a rallying market, as you'll quickly find yourself unemployed. But certainly it is a solution that could be perfect for other problems, such as lack of funding.

5. Can I accept the risk?

Sometimes, having considered options for avoiding, reducing frequency, reducing consequences or transferring the risk, we find that there is NOTHING MORE that can be done. We then have no option but to accept it. In other words, do not worry about things you cannot change. Consider whether or not that is acceptable. Sometimes it is.



My Go-To Method for Solving Trading Problems


The internet is full of problem-solving models and systems.

But here's one I've been using my whole trading career.

It's a simple series of three questions.

A subset of five questions regularly used back in my Aviation days in order to manage risks (only three of the five are usually relevant in the trading field).

<image: My Go-To Method for Solving Trading Problems>

Three simple questions:

  1. Can I avoid the problem?
  2. Can I reduce the frequency?
  3. Can I reduce the consequences?


Putting this perhaps into simpler English:

  1. Is there something I can do that will ensure I never even encounter "the problem"?
  2. Is there something I can do that will ensure "the problem" won't happen as often as it has been?
  3. Is there something I can do such that when "the problem" does occur, the negative outcome won't be so bad?


Most importantly, we're not after vague "touchy feely" solutions.

So I don't want an answer of "I just need to be more disciplined" or "I just need to try harder".

This social media post from last year comes to mind.

<image: I just need more discipline... WRONG>

We want REAL solutions.

Something actionable. Something measurable. Something testable.

Systems. Routines. Processes. Checklists.

Or anything else technical or process driven in nature.

Let's work through a simple example.

We'll use a question I received on Twitter a week ago:

<image: The problem...>

Visualising "the problem", it would be something like this:

<image: The problem...>

So how can we solve this?

Rather than me giving my solutions, I think we'll get more value if we make this interactive.

I want to hear some of your solutions. And then I'll share some of them next week in a continuation of this article.

So, given this problem:

  • An inability to trust a rally resulting in continued attempts to fade the rally and grinding my way into a completely avoidable drawdown.


How can we solve it?

Can you find a solution through one, two or even three of these simple questions:

  1. Can I avoid the problem?
  2. Can I reduce the frequency?
  3. Can I reduce the consequences?


Or in simpler English:

  1. Is there something I can do that will ensure I never even encounter "the problem"?
  2. Is there something I can do that will ensure "the problem" won't happen as often as it has been?
  3. Is there something I can do such that when "the problem" does occur, the negative outcome won't be so bad?


Please leave a comment in the blog post – identifying both the question that you're using and the solution. Or send an email to support@yourtradingcoach.com

To be continued…

Lance Beggs



What if you Redefined your Primary Role as a Discretionary Trader?


Most discretionary traders see their job like this:

<image: What if you redefined your primary role as a trader?>

What if you switched this around a bit?

What if you redefined your job as follows:

<image: What if you redefined your primary role as a trader?>

Is it possible that relentless focus and commitment to the processes and routines which guide your decision making and behaviour… might just see improvement in the actual trading results?

This doesn't mean we're no longer discretionary traders. Discretion can be built into processes. But how we come about our trade decisions, is standardised and made as consistent as possible.

The following post was shared recently on social media:

<image: What if you redefined your primary role as a trader?>

Essentially, we're expanding upon this idea.

For each of the areas listed in that post, we aim to:

  • Seek excellence in development of routines and processes for carrying out that role, and
  • Seek consistency in implementing the routines and processes.


It's said, "That which is measured, improves".

But ONLY if that which is measured is applied consistently.

And consistency will only occur if the process is clearly defined.

So maybe consider a little shift in how you define your role as a trader.

Primary role: Development, out-of-session, of world-best routines and processes for (a) finding and exploiting edge, and (b) reviewing and driving growth.

Secondary role: Trading, for the purpose of implementation, validation and testing of the routines and processes, defined above.

Happy trading,

Lance Beggs



Thoughts Leading into the New Year


My performance last year… NO LONGER MATTERS.


I am scheduling time during my Christmas and New Year break for three major areas of focus:


I don't yet know the challenges that I'll face in the new year, but I know that I will be ready.

As the opening bell rings on day one, I will be primed for peak performance.

Physically, mentally and emotionally recharged.

Confident, alert and FOCUSED.


I don't yet know the market conditions that I'll face in the new year, but I know that I will be ready.

And I will have learnt from the lessons of the past.

My performance and process reviews will have identified both successes and failures.

That which I did poorly… I'll know exactly how to improve.

And that which I did well… I'll know exactly how to do better.


I don't yet know the price sequences that I'll face in the new year, but I know that I will be ready.

Clearly defined goals.

Clearly defined routines.

All set for quality decision making and process-driven focus, no matter what the markets throw at me.

Rest… review… and prepare!

When the new year comes… I'll be ready.

Will you?

Lance Beggs

<image: Rest - Review - Prepare> 



The Counter-Intuitive Path to Trading Success


I recently received an email from a YTC reader with an incredibly important insight into trading success.

Here's an extract from the email:

Hi Lance,

I heard this recently while watching football.

It's not how many great plays you make, it's how few bad plays you make.

I immediately emailed this to myself because it is so applicable to trading. I know where the good places are to trade, but the key is waiting for price to get there and not "forcing" a trade.

It also ties in well to your Facebook posts last week and the latest blog article.

Here is the full quote I found online:

"Like I always say, it's not how many great plays you make; it's how few bad ones you make. I know fans, and even some losing coaches, are enamored with long pass completions or the great run plays, but that doesn't offset the interception or the fumble."… Jimmy Johnson 


I love it!

This is absolutely 100% applicable to trading.

It's the counter-intuitive path to trading success.

Reduce the number of bad trades.

How do we do that?

1. We limit our trading to our best setups only.

Get absolutely clear on what an A+ trading opportunity should look like. And then cut out anything that doesn't meet these strict requirements.

Define the context. Where will these trades be found within the wider market structure? Now limit trading ONLY to those places on the chart.

How should price be moving (speed, volatility, smoothness)? Define your ideal conditions and put in place controls to ensure you trade ONLY when those conditions are in play.

2. We have a predetermined plan for execution.

Now that we're limited to trading only within an ideal context (market structure and price conditions), you need to be completely clear on how you execute and manage your trade opportunity.

Consistency in execution requires standard default plans with regards to sizing, entry triggers, stop and target locations. Plus any additional techniques which might be relevant to your style of trading, such as when you will scale in or out, or under what conditions you will re-enter if stopped out. Your decisions may involve some discretion. That's fine. But this discretion should be built into your standard management plan.

You need to know what to do… and when to do it. No hesitation. 

3. We monitor our performance to identify and reduce errors.

Track everything! If you make an error or poor decision, record it.

Look to your longer term stats during your weekly or monthly reviews. If you find something repeating over time, then that is cause for celebration. You have found a way to improve your edge. Find a way to cut out the error, or at least reduce the likelihood or frequency of occurrence.

<image: Track Your Errors>

Image: Error tracking via the Trading Journal Spreadsheet!

It's not how many great plays you make, it's how few bad plays you make.

Along the same lines, but for those who are not into sport and perhaps relate more to art, I saw this quote recently which I quite liked:

"The sculpture is already complete within the marble block, before I start my work. It is already there, I just have to chisel away the superfluous material."… Michaelangelo

Trading success is already there.

It's just hidden beneath all the errors and poor decisions. We just need to chisel away at them, getting rid of the bad trades and poor decisions, and allow the underlying success to reveal itself.

Trade well,

Lance Beggs

PS. See here also for the same theme – https://yourtradingcoach.com/trading-business/are-you-closer-to-profitability-than-you-thought/