Tag Archives: Risk Management

Two Attempts – Then Reassess


I see far too many traders destroy a session through fighting the market. Again and again and again.

Stop fighting the market

You need to break the pattern.

Try implementing this rule:

Two Attempts – Then Reassess!


After two attempts at a trade idea, if it hasn't worked, it's clear that something is not right. You're not in sync with the market.


  • You have misread the situation and you're wrong, or
  • Your timing is out (which still means you're wrong).


Break the pattern!

Two Attempts – Then Reassess!

Confirm your position is flat.

Step away from the charts.

Clear your mind.

Then reassess from first principles.

Try also to see the picture from the perspective of someone who might have the opposite bias to you. What are they seeing? Could they be right?

You may choose to get back in for a further trade (assuming session drawdown limits are not hit).

But you may also have prevented a meltdown; stopping a good trade idea which didn't work from turning into an absolute mess of a session.

Here's a recent trade sequence where I implemented this rule – Two Attempts – Then Reassess!


Your Number One Priority… Survive the Learning Phase!


Before you even think about strategy…

Reduce the risk of single trade catastrophic failure.

Stop losses are essential. If you think you can operate without them, leave my site now. Unsubscribe. Professional traders respect the risk within the market.

If your platform does not allow for automatic submission of stop loss orders when your entry order is filled, then get a new platform.

And keep single-trade risk to acceptable levels (see Chapter 8).


Reduce the risk of single session catastrophic failure.

Ensure your plan contains a session stop. That is, the dollar or percentage loss that will trigger a decision to HALT ALL TRADING for that day.

If you're out of sync with the market, get out of there.

Survive to trade another day.

And if you do not have the ability to stick to this decision then find a broker who will implement it for you, preventing further trades once the session stop is hit. They're out there. If you need this, find one who offers it.

Swing traders… you might wish to extend this to a weekly stop. Or monthly stop.


Reduce the risk of a slow-bleed loss of account over time.

Implement a maximum drawdown stop.

Your trading is clearly not going according to plan.

It's time to stop. Take a lengthy break. And then reassess.

Take this trading halt as an opportunity to review your trading plan and your trading performance, with the benefit of hindsight.

Return to a simulator environment until such time as (a) consistent profitability is again proven in that environment, and (b) the account balance has been replenished via other sources.


Always remember – your number one priority is to survive the learning phase.

Happy trading,

Lance Beggs



Order Entry Error – Immediate Actions & Working an Exit


I thought it would be good to expand upon some of the ideas discussed on YTC social media last weekend.

Here are the three social media posts first…

26th March:

Order Entry Error - Immediate Actions - Post 1

27th March:

Order Entry Error - Immediate Actions - Post 2

28th March:

Order Entry Error - Immediate Actions - Post 3

There are two main points that I'd like to examine in a little more detail.

  1. Immediate Actions
  2. Working an Exit


Immediate Actions

So let's say you've traded the sequence above, and just recognised the entry error. What are your actions?

The obvious advice is to scratch immediately. It's what most educators will suggest. And often it is good advice. Immediately take responsibility for the error and take your loss.

I won't ever have a problem with someone who does this.

Especially in the following cases:

  • Your trading session is in drawdown and has reached your daily loss limit. You're clearly not in sync with the market today. Take the loss. And get away from the screen for a while.
  • Your mindset is already a mess. You're frustrated! You're angry! Whatever the reason, take the loss. And get away from the screen for a while.


For these occurrences, immediately scratching is likely the best option. Take the loss. And review the whole session at a later time (or even the next day) when it can be looked at with an objective and clear mind.

But in all other cases, I think we can improve on this.

Here's the thing… there is often no need to panic.

You will often have sufficient time to make a quick assessment and determine whether or not the position is an immediate threat… or not.

That is… does the current situation have a high probability of rapidly getting worse? Or is it maybe not so bad? Can you maybe even recover the situation?

Let's change the context a little. We'll start with some very simple examples.


Defining “No-Trade Zones”


Let's look one final time at last week's trade sequence.

The problem we attempted to address was one of continual attempts to fade long and extended price swings, finding that instead of timing that entry to perfection we more often than not end up with two to three stop outs, and a mindset destroyed for the remainder of the session.

Check it out if you missed it – https://yourtradingcoach.com/trading-process-and-strategy/let-it-turn-then-find-your-entry/

This was the sequence on the "trading timeframe":

The trading timeframe view

This was the "lower timeframe" view of the challenge we face in trying to time the entry short:

The lower timeframe view - "what we don't do"

This article seems to have resonated with a number of readers, who felt as if it was written personally for them and their circumstances. Here's one example:

Great advice, Lance! As always. I really loved your explanation “Here’s what we don’t do” in the article. It’s so true. It's totally about me in the recent past and so funny to recall. How many times have I found myself trying to get short below every upper-tail candle somewhere in the vicinity of “here’s a support, it goes down now”, only to get stopped out. A daily and weekly review process helps me to get rid of these dumb trades now, but it's really cool to refresh this experience by reading your article.

My reply:

Thanks! Glad you enjoyed it. "Getting rid of dumb trades" is a great plan for driving progress. I still do dumb trades. We all do. But if you can identify over time those dumb ones that you always seem to repeat… they're the ones you can work to get rid of to provide a big boost to your edge.

The solution last week was simple. Stand aside during the long and extended price swing. Wait for the market to turn. Only then should you seek entry.

The solution - let the market turn - then seek entry 

So this led to a different kind of feedback, in which people asked, "how do we know when to stand aside?"

Great question!

Let me answer first based upon this particular sequence; and then we'll wrap it up with some general guidance for when to stand aside.

So… why did I decide to stand aside during this sequence?

It was the strength in the candles as price rallied to the resistance level.


You’ve GOT to Target Multiple-R Winners


Most trades will typically fall in the range from -1R to +1R… hopefully more on the positive side of that range.

But for most of us this does not mean you should be targeting 1:1 trades all day, every day.

By all means take them if you assess them as being a higher probability play. But you'll need to maintain a 70% or more win-rate if you want to achieve any decent long-term profits with ONLY 1:1 trades.

That's a tough ask!

It's far better, in my opinion, to aim to break up that stream of -1R to +1R trades with the occasional large multiple-R profit.

When market structure and price action suggest the potential for a multiple-R trade, target those higher returns.


You've got to target multiple-R winners

You've got to target multiple-R winners

You've got to target multiple-R winners


So the obvious question is, "When should we be more patient with a trade and hold it for a larger runner?"

There is a recent amendment to my pre-session routine which can help answer this question.


Professionals Traded Here! What Were They Seeing That You Couldn’t See?


We've talked in previous articles about the fact that the best opportunity is found close to the edges of the market structure.

Or another way to express the idea… "Confirmation is risk!"

Typically when posting these sort of articles I get a comment or two of the following type:

But again, let me come back to the comment provided in last week's article, "Confirmation is Risk! (Part 2)"

"Why shouldn't we try to pick tops and bottoms? That's where the risk is smallest and the profit potential is greatest."

Standard TA won't make you money! You can't just do what everyone else is doing. You need to be smarter than the crowd.

You have two choices.

1. Look at a chart at a point of reversal and say with stubbornness:

  • "It's not possible to enter there."

2. Or look at the same chart with curiosity and say:

  • "Professionals traded here. They didn't wait for confirmation. So what did they see that I was missing?"

Curiosity and it's associated growth mindset will get you a lot further in this game than stubbornness and a fixed mindset.

Let's look at a few examples, from different markets and timeframes as those offered in the earlier articles.


Confirmation is Risk! (Part 2)


I don't recall who said this… and I'm paraphrasing… but I absolutely loved it when I heard it and it's stuck with me ever since.

"Why shouldn't we try to pick tops and bottoms? That's where the risk is smallest and the profit potential is greatest."

(If you recognise the actual quote can you please provide me with a source so that I can provide appropriate credit! Maybe Sam Seiden… it sounds like something he'd say!)

So yes… I try to pick tops and bottoms.

And that freaks some people out. I know… they send me emails. And they're not always nice!

But the fact remains… the tops and bottoms are definitely where the risk is smallest and the profit potential is greatest. Someone is trading in those areas, selling at the tops and buying at the bottoms. If it's not the retail trader, who typically waits for confirmation, then perhaps it's the professional. Maybe you should be ask yourself how you can see what they're seeing?

Last week we re-explored the concept of confirmation being risk. Real opportunity is found as close to the edges of the market structure as you can get. Where the risk is smallest and the profit potential is greatest.

Is it easy? No. It requires greater skill at reading the sentiment within the price movement.

But is it worth exploring as a means to improving your edge? Absolutely!

This was the trade we examined last week:

Confirmation is Risk

See the prior article here if you missed it: https://yourtradingcoach.com/trading-process-and-strategy/confirmation-is-risk/

As mentioned at the end of that article, this session went on to provide some further, very similar, opportunity. So let's explore them today.


Confirmation is Risk! (Part 1)


(Note: Not for beginners! This takes a bit more skill and experience. File it away for now… or practice on the sim… if you're not ready for this.)

We looked at this idea previously, that confirmation is risk:

However, it's been well over a year since that article so I thought it a good time to revisit this concept.

Confirmation is Risk

Confirmation is Risk

Confirmation is Risk

Confirmation is Risk

Confirmation is Risk


Is This a Stupid Trade?


Email from a YTC reader who I'll leave anonymous!  🙂

Hi lance. How are you? I wanted to ask you, do you use hard stops or mental stops? I had a trade today go wrong on me because I think either my stop was too tight or I shouldn't have used a hard stop. I'll attach the trade. Thanks!

Here's the attached image:

Is this a stupid trade?

NB. The horizontal white line at 32.78 is not an S/R level. This is simply the last traded price.

What I find most concerning here is (a) the trader referring to the trade as "stupid", and (b) informing me that this left him feeling out of sorts for the rest of the day.

My reply: