Hindsight analysis is always suspect. Our normal human biases have us believing that we would have made the optimal trade decisions. After all, they always look so simple with the benefit of hindsight.
So I'm always hesitant to provide my thoughts on someone else's trade review.
But it's the Christmas / New Year week and I'm feeling too lazy to think up a new article, so sharing some email Q&A solves that problem for me.
And it provides a good lesson – if you find yourself out of a trade, for whatever reason, the reality is that you won't always find a way back in.
If you've scratched a trade to reassess and decide that there is still potential, unless you're just willing to enter at market then and there, or place a limit order at some point closer to the stop area, you might not find a way to re-enter. Pattern triggers may not eventuate.
And that's fine. Review the decision that led to the initial scratching. And move on.
I scratch trades a lot. If I doubt a trade, I'll reduce risk through either a partial or full exit, and then reassess. If I'm happy with the premise, I'll look to get back in. But sometimes… there is no good way to get back in.
In developing as a trader and discovering whether you better fit the passive set and forget trade management style, or a more active style such as I use, this is a factor that you need to consider. If you find yourself out of your trade, the reality is that you won't always find a way back in.
Anyway, here's the Q&A from a trader who recently asked me to review one of their EUR/USD trades, in which they took profits early but then were unable to get back in.
The question was sent to me in image chart form. It's displayed here in smaller format, in order to fit. If you click on the image it will open a full-size version in your browser. All following images are already full size.
INITIAL QUESTION:
REPLY:
Happy trading,
Lance Beggs
Wow Mr. Lance Beggs, light bulb moment.
Thank you.
Thanks Cloudy! That’s awesome. I love the light bulb moments.
Best of luck with your trading,
Lance.